|
English 101 – Expository Writing
|
 |
|
instructor
|
class
times / location |
office hours |
|
Rick
Van Noy
Jason Long
Laurel Devoto |
10 - 10:50 / CHIE 317
12 - 12:50 / RU 032
1 - 1:50 / RU 032 |
MW: 11-12; TR 10-11
M: 1-2; TR, 11-12
M: 3-4; T: 2-3 |
|
COURSE DESCRIPTION
This
course will offer opportunities to explore your own reading and writing
processes, to give and take valid criticism and to participate in peer
review groups as a means of developing your writing and critiquing skills.
Our day will typically involve a discussion of the reading, punctuated my
mini-lectures on elements of the writing process, and some writing. As
the course title suggests, the writing we do will be "expository," which
means "to explain," "to expose," and "to expound." The reasoning behind
the course is simple: the ability to write effectively and without anxiety
is a skill of great importance, one you should master. No matter what your
career path, eventually you will have to write. Your ability to write is
also important to your future academic success and your individual growth.
By the end of this course, you should have a greater understanding of
yourself as a writer and an understanding of the many forms of expression
your writing can take.
Objectives —
The main
goal is for you to become a better writer—richer
and more precise—and to become a better
reader—more responsive and insightful.
COURSE POLICIES
Presence, Preparation, and Participation.
College is supposed to be voluntary. You are here because
you want to be. But you cannot gain skills and knowledge unless you put
forth effort. We could talk about writing endlessly, but, as in most
endeavors, you won't learn it until you work at it and practice--again and
again. English courses are not lecture courses; they are reading and
writing courses that require your consistent and active engagement. As
such, they often have a de facto attendance policy. You can't
earn high marks in this process if you aren't present, prepared, and
participating. We and your classmates expect you to attend regularly and
prepare thoughtfully for each class session. Complete the assignments
prior to our meeting and come to class ready to work, share, and listen.
If you miss 4 days of class (whatever the excuse),
your grade
will be affected and you should consider withdrawing from the course.
If you miss six days, you will have missed so much in terms of daily work
and instruction that you will unconditionally fail the course.
If you must be absent because of a bona-fide excuse, please notify your instructor by phone or email.
Note
that you will have several days off while others are undergoing peer
review and on days when conferences are scheduled. Also, please be on
time. Lateness is rude, and lateness (without a good excuse) will count
as 1/2 an absence and against your participation.
Electronics -- Technology can enhance learning,
but it can also impede it, distracting us from focusing on the issues at
hand. As a courtesy, please turn off your cell phones and
other gadgetry (in fact, please check them before you enter the room and
leave them off your desk). One
skill you should be learning is listening, to your instructor and to
your peers, taking in their ideas, and cell phones distract from this
learning. Also, laptops are fine for taking
notes on lecture material, but please close the screen during class
discussion so we can have your full attention.
Peer Review
— Throughout the semester, class meetings will be devoted to reviewing and
critiquing rough drafts of assignments. Writers seldom work completely in
isolation all the time; therefore, it is important, at different stages of
the writing and revising process, to share information, discuss
strategies, and receive feedback. Throughout the semester, you will work
closely with your classmates reading and responding to each other's work.
Everyone will benefit if we are all prepared to engage in this type of
work. A paper that does not receive an in-class peer review will be
penalized when submitted as a final draft (papers that are only half
written or that don't exhibit a solid first try don't benefit from the
intensive scrutiny and revision suggestions of peer review. These, too,
will be frowned on and can affect the final grade, since we also emphasize
the process of writing as well as the finished product).
On
the day before peer review, you are required to bring enough copies of
your paper for your group and one for your instructor (so we may read your
paper ahead of time). Please don't be absent on this day. If you are, you
are responsible for getting your paper to your group members and to me.
Send copies in with a friend or email them to us. Your participation in
these groups is vital to your growth as a writer and the success of the
course, so read your peers’ drafts thoroughly and provide the kinds of
feedback you yourself would like to receive. The draft you produce for
these groups should be written as if it were a final version. For
the last paper, you will be flying solo. If you get me the paper before
the final day it is due, I promise to return it to you within two days so
you can make necessary revisions. Or, I have two days of conferences
scheduled for that period. Ideally, I read your paper before the
conference. Two rules to keep in mind for peer review (and class):
 |
You
are not your writing. |
 |
You
will be rude to no one and no one will be rude to you.
|
For peer review,
you'll fill out a sheet like this for each paper:
Writer's Memo
— When writers send their writing to a publisher, they
always send a cover letter introducing it. For FINAL VERSIONS of papers
you turn in, you should submit a separate writer's memo that considers
your purpose for writing, your process (what you went
through, including the comments from peer review), the audience it
is written for, what difficulties you had and what you learned from them,
what the strengths of the paper are, and what led you to write about it.
In a nutshell, comment on the choices you made as a writer (think of it
like an instant replay on your writing process with color commentary).
When you hand in final versions, you will also be asked to include your
rough draft, your invention writing, any sentence-level revision
exercises, your skills checklist, and your peer review sheets. The
Writer's Memo should also address these stages in the writing process,
detailing what you have done to improve the writing. A good Writer's Memo
assesses what you see as the strengths and weaknesses of the piece, and a
thoughtful, well-written memo, because it accounts for things we might
have missed, can improve your grade.
Document Appearance
-- Please wordprocess and save all papers and
drafts. Use a descriptive title for your paper; it should identify the
author and/or work and your slant or thesis. Also, provide a heading at
the top left of you paper (your name, class, instructor name, and date)
and page numbers (with your last name) in the upper right. Double space,
use 1.25" margins all around (room for comments) and a readable font (11
pt Times Roman is good).
Late Work — Late papers will be penalized one full grade per day late.
Class log entries will not be accepted late and they will only be accepted
if you are present.
Conferences and Office Hours
—
Check with your instructor about office hours. Please take advantage of
these times. Those who converse with the instructor tend to come to a more
complete understanding of the course material than those who do not. If
you are confused about anything in the class, please
come talk to us. We will also respond promptly to email and phone
messages. At least once during the first half of the semester we should
meet to discuss your progress. During this conference, we’ll look at what
you’ve written and completed, how you’ve grown,
and what you still need to work on. We expect that you’ll assess yourself
and set goals for the next part of the semester. Please feel free to
schedule additional conferences with any time.
Revision —
The
magic word for the class is "revision." You will have the opportunity to
revise things you write, but we caution you against mechanically following
our suggestions without using some of your own. Just because you do what
we or your peers tell you doesn’t mean that you
will get an "A." In your follow-up writer’s memo, you will focus on what
you did in revision.
Academic Dishonesty
— Radford University supports an Honor Code to which each of you is
obliged to adhere. "By accepting admission to Radford University, each
student makes a commitment to understand, support, and abide by the
University Honor Code without compromise or exception. Violations of
academic integrity will not be tolerated. This class will be conducted in
strict observance of the Honor Code. Please refer to your Student Handbook
for details."
Students with Disabilities
— If you are seeking classroom accommodations under the Americans with
Disabilities Act (ADA), you are required to register with the Disability
Resource Office (DRO). The DRO is located in the Center for Counseling
and Student Development on the lower level of Tyler Hall, and can be
reached at 831-6350. To receive academic accommodations, please obtain the
DRO forms and then meet with your instructor.
Extra Credit —
Anyone who misses only one class (or none) will receive 2.5 points added
to their final grade (an 88% = 90.5%).
You can
receive 2.5 pts. extra credit (90=92.5) on any
paper that you submit for publication: the school paper, literary
magazine, writing contests, etc. Professional writers write for readers
(not just their teachers), and we want you to write as you would (and
will) outside the classroom.
WORK LOAD
We’re
striving for quality rather than quantity—surgical precision rather than
mountains of text. In addition to shorter assignments (your class log),
you will write only four papers. We will try to specify a length in the
assignments, but suffice it say that the paper needs to be long enough to
make its point and make it well.
Paper #1
— Reflective Narrative. We will look at a variety of remembered event
papers to see how writers narrate, tell (and show), cajole, and
wheedle--and the whys and wherefores of doing so. This is a good one to
begin with: easy, merciful, and offers a way to begin the class with you
feeling like you’re the writer and not someone else. This paper will
probably rely heavily on description. You will use your powers of
observation and recollection to make us "see" your subject and ultimately
your point. Remember, the reflective narrative is also guided by an awareness of
audience. Think twice before writing about your learning to drive, the
prom, the day you won the game, graduation, or beach week. Experiences
such as these often match your audience’s
expectations for them, and provide no new insights or discoveries. Look
beyond the momentous occasion to the almost mundane.
Paper #2
— Synthesis. Syntheses share many
features with personal writing: they use recollection, observation,
narration, anecdote, description, and dialogue. But, syntheses differ
significantly from autobiographical writing. Whereas the personal
narrative reflected on a remembered personal experience, the synthesis presents and
synthesizes newly acquired information, and keeps a safe
critical distance from its subject. You observe data (take field notes
like a naturalist or anthropologist) and analyze and organize it so that
it is both informative and interesting to readers. You might attend an
unusual event, and write up your observations of the people, place and the
activity; or, you might interview a person who has an unusual hobby or job
and write a profile based on your notes.
Paper #3
— Evaluation. The trick here is to construct an argument of
evaluation. You could evaluate a concert (symphony?), a play, an art
exhibit or examine several things that fall in the same classification or
cluster. "Reality TV shows signify the end of the civilized world as we
know it." How can you make such a statement? "The Dukes of
Hazard was the worst movie ever." Based on what criteria? Every day it seems we make evaluations
and judgments, sometimes spontaneously, in response to events, people and
things. "Oh, I don’t know, I just like it." Rarely do we think out a
reasoned, careful argument based on appropriate criteria, although we
constantly give reasons for our evaluations in a casual way. Once you
study your subject, you begin to cultivate judgment, making it more sound,
more discriminating, less reckless, and not merely "judgmental" or
opinionated.
Paper #4
— Persuasion/proposal. "Argument" sometimes refers to writing that is
reason-based, whereas "persuasion" can be more emotion-based. Also, people
sometimes think an "argument" is something you win. This paper still needs
a thesis and reasonable substantiation, but I want you to focus on
persuading us of something instead of the research material (that’s next
semester), on cajoling rather than reproaching (the tone should be
lighter). Use your whole rhetorical arsenal. Many topics (drugs, abortion,
death penalty, gun control) are banned. Convince your audience of
something else: why the sky isn’t really blue (it’s often gray). This will
come after we read essays that try to pull everything together, and I
would encourage you to do the same. A good way to start this paper is to
go back to what you did in #1 and begin with an anecdote (narrative) to
frame your subsequent argument. Perhaps you will want to write a proposal
about some change on campus.
Class log
— These
will frequently be directed assignments on a topic
or a particular reading where you will be asked to respond to an essay’s
effectiveness or to pre-write for an upcoming essay. Logs are still due
on the due-date even if you are not in class.
GRADING
(Note:
Grading is not a mathematical science; we consider effort, and sincere,
constructive class participation may raise your grade. We also reserve the
right to schedule additional quizzes, tests, or papers.)
Paper #1
Paper #2
Paper #3
Paper #4
Class log
Contribution
(attendance, readings, discussion) |
15%
20%
20%
20%
15%
10% |
|
Component: %
|
A
Level Grades
|
B
Level Grades
|
C
Level Grades
|
D-F
Grades
|
|
Presence: 5
|
Never miss a class |
Miss
2 - 3 classes |
Miss
two weeks. |
Miss
three weeks |
|
Participation and preparation: 5
|
Active talking & listening, excellent recall of night's reading |
Mostly listen, read some but not all, fair recall. |
Silent and inattentive. Fails to bring book or even notebook to class.
|
Sometimes rude; hardly ever prepared.
|
|
Class Log: 15
|
Responses of high quality |
Responses and in-class writing of good quality. |
Fair
quality. |
Poor
quality.
|
|
Papers: 75
|
More on
the
criteria for evaluating papers. |
|
What
you need to do to do well
in this class
|
 |
Work hard on your writing (both formal and informal) during and outside of
class. |
|
 |
Be present for every class and prepared (which means
keep up with the reading) to
participate.
|
|
 |
Demonstrate an interest in improving your writing
through risk-taking and "deep" revision, which is different than
fixing. |
|
 |
Share your work with others and respond
thoughtfully, considerately, and constructively to their work.
|
|
 |
Welcome
uncertainty and ambiguity. |
What we need to do to do well in this class
|
 |
Guide you through the writing process, teaching
specific skills, strategies and techniques.
|
|
 |
Be available to discuss your work. |
|
 |
Respond to your writing and teach others to do the
same.
|
|
 |
Evaluate your work and keep track of your progress.
|
|
 |
Provide an atmosphere (risk-free and
disturbance-free) where you can write, along with the contexts and
prompts to propel your writing process. |
|
|
|