|
| |
[home] [schedule]
[weekly response]
 |
English 324: The Study
of Non-fiction:
The Literature of Place |

|
This is the most beautiful place on earth. There are many such places. Every
man, every woman, carries in heart and mind the image of the ideal place, the right place,
the one true home, known or unknown, actual or visionary. A houseboat in Kashmir, a view
down Atlantic Avenue in Brooklyn, a gray gothic farmhouse two stories high at the end of a
red dog road in the Allegheny Mountains, a cabin on the shore of a blue lake in spruce and
fir country, a greasy alley near the Hoboken waterfront, or even, possibly, for those of a
less demanding sensibility, the world to be seen from a comfortable apartment high in the
tender velvety smog of Manhattan, Chicago, Paris, Tokyo, Rio or Rome--there's no limit to
the human capacity for the homing sentiment. Theologians, sky pilots, astronauts have felt
the appeal of home calling to them from up above, in the cold black outback of
interstellar space.
Edward Abbey, from the opening lines of Desert
Solitaire
When one really knows a [place] like this and its surroundings, it
is like becoming acquainted with a single person. The process of falling in
love at first sight is as final as it is swift in such a case, but the growth of a true
friendship may be a lifelong affair.
Sarah Orne Jewett, The Country of the Pointed Firs |
Course Overview
This course will focus on a handful of writers who have written extended essays on a
place. They write "non-fiction," a term more useful for explaining what it is
not than what it is. These works are certainly creative, and have a strong element of the
poetic. These writers all exhibit the serious attention to language, form and thought that
characterizes other kinds literature--poetry, drama, fiction--but with particular
attention to a common theme.
Our focus will be somewhat narrower than "the essay," but will nevertheless
focus on a specific genre. This course will examine interesting and illuminating
connections between literature and place.
Like all English courses, this is a course in reading and writing. You will not only
read non-fiction essays, you will write them. The goal for this course is for you to
become a better reader--more responsive and insightful--and a better writer-richer and
more precise. Since this is a literature course and not course on philosophy or ecology,
our attention will mostly be on the style and rhetoric in these writers and the shape of
this interdisciplinary genre that has common topics and concerns. To read in this way, we
will be noticing, interrogating, and comparing, which means careful reading, individually
and as a community of readers. This process, which at best is both personal and
collaborative, results in exploring all the possible meanings of each text.
Requirements:
Since one goal of the course is to increase awareness of your role as agents in and
observers of the world around you, you will write weekly reflective pieces on assigned
readings, reminiscent of a journal entry. These personal responses are intended to be
informal contemplations that nonetheless demonstrate an active engagement with the
literature. These weekly entries should be about 250 - 300 words long, composed in
response to study questions, and emailed to your instructor before the
second class period of that particular work (usually Wednesday, but times can
change).
Purpose: Writing a log on the readings should help to enrich your
understanding and strengthen your powers of verbal expression. The best aspect of
keeping a journal is that it supports your personal and intellectual growth. (It also
verifies that you've done the reading, thought about it, and don't need quizzes to test
that knowledge.) The weekly entry is your initial contribution to class discussion. I will
review the group's entries and guide discussion accordingly. (That's why they should come
in early.) In discussion, you are expected to go beyond those points, listen to others,
and develop fresh ideas. The journal entry is not a substitute for talking and listening
well.
Study Questions -- The study questions will pose questions about the
reading and may provide links to Library or Web resources. The questions help provide a
focus for your journal entry (so you don't just ramble or tell anecdotes). Entries that
ignore questions may receive little or no credit. In general, the will ask these questions when we discuss the works.
Content of Entries -- You are expected to work toward three
objectives: (1) Respond to a particular study question. (2) Show your knowledge of the
reading, from beginning to end, both in large concepts and specific details. (3) Provide a
point of view or question about the reading that contributes to class discussion. You are
working to turn a mix of facts, ideas, and opinions into a crisp, coherent statement. Your
reading log is a series of snapshots about what you are thinking and learning.
Your entries need not be a polished final product. The prose should be informal but
clear and correct (please spellcheck and proofread) and could be considered the level of
discourse you might expect in a good letter or memo from a colleague at work. It should be
writing however and not "chat" (as in a chat room), because this kind of
writing/speech can be slangy, disconnected, and simplistic in vocabulary.
Criteria for assessment -- Each log will be graded
according to how successfully it: 1) exhibits a clear point of view about the reading that
opens up discussion of key issues raised by the text; 2) uses evidence and correct MLA
notation to support that point of view; 3) demonstrates clear and correct writing. Each
log will receive a grade of 3 (strong), 2 (acceptable), 1 (poor) or no credit .
Papers and Peer Review -- Students will also be required to write two
more formal, analytical papers, of about three to five pages (3-5) each. These essays
should demonstrate critical thinking and the ability to formulate and present an argument.
We will devote some class to writing the paper and to reviewing and editing them. A draft
of your paper will be due early in the week, you will distribute to your group so your
they can read and make comments and prepare for a group session on those drafts on a later
day. If your paper fails to undergo a peer review, it will be penalized when submitted as
a final draft. NO LATE WORK WILL BE ACCEPTED for the papers. For the responses, a few
exceptions can be made. If you fail to hand in either Paper #1 or #2, you will
unconditionally fail the course. For the second paper, you must consult and write
annotations for at least three sources, even if you do not cite them in your final paper.
Presence,
Preparation, and Participation --
English courses are not lecture courses; they are
reading and writing courses that require your consistent and active engagement. As such,
they often have a de facto attendance policy, as this one does. You can't earn high marks in
this process if you aren't present, prepared, and participating. Your instructor and your
classmates expect you to attend regularly and prepare thoughtfully for each class session.
Complete the assignments prior to our meeting and come to class ready to work, share, and
listen. Writers seldom work completely in isolation all the time; therefore, it is
important, at different stages of the writing and revising process, to share information,
discuss strategies, and receive feedback. Throughout the semester, you will most likely
work closely with your classmates reading and responding to each other's work. Everyone
will benefit if we are all prepared to engage in this type of work. Miss more than two
weeks of class (7 days MWF, 5 days T,TH,) and you will receive an F for the course).
Persons missing one class or none will receive extra credit.
Academic Honesty and Plagiarism The University Affairs Council has asked
all faculty to include the following statement in our course policies:
"By accepting admission to Radford University, each student makes a commitment to
understand, support, and abide by the University Honor Code without compromise or
exception. Violations of academic integrity will not be tolerated. This class will be
conducted in strict observance of the Honor Code. Please refer to your Student Handbook
for details."
Plagiarism, or the use of work by another
person, or the use of someone else's words, ideas or arrangement of ideas without giving
proper reference to the author, is a serious violation of the Honor Code. You must give
credit to other people's ideas and word, even if you put the idea in your own words (even
if you paraphrase it). You must also provide full and correct documentation of the exact
location of any sources that helped you, including Web or electronic resources. Plagiarism
will result in an "F" for the course and the institution of formal disciplinary
procedures.
Grading
Weekly Response: 3 points each, 30 possible
Two papers on assigned readings : 25 points each for total of 50 (A = 25; B=20; C=17;
D=14; F=0);
Reflection essays: 5 pts each for a total of 10 points
3 Ps, including teaching: 10 pts
100 points possible A=91-100 points B=81-90 C=71-80 D=61-70 F=60 or fewer |
| (Note: Grading is not a mathematical science; we consider
effort, and sincere, constructive class participation may raise your grade.) |
| Component: % |
A Level Grades |
B Level Grades |
C Level Grades |
D-F Grades |
Presence,
Preparation Participation: 10 |
Hardly ever miss a class; active
talking & listening, alert and thoughtful |
miss 3 classes classes, prepared
but mostly listen |
miss 4 -5, sometimes late, silent
& inattentive |
miss 6 or more; Sometimes
rude |
Reading Log: 30 |
high quality questions, response
and writing; good summary, citation and paraphrase |
good quality, some evidence,
general questions |
fair quality analysis and
response; poor documentation |
fair quality analysis and
response; poor documentation |
Beginning and
ending reflections: 10 |
say something, fulfill the
assignment in a fresh and mature way |
say something, but a little more
predictable and without the specificity of A papers |
Say very little: are general and
vague, do not develop ideas, provide few specifics, lacks unity and focus |
show the inability to handle the
previous criteria. |
Papers: 50 |
Original views, strong evidence
& argument, clear precise prose |
Familiar views, weak evidence
& argument, vague prose |
Few ideas, chaotic form, no
argument, often incorrect prose |
Vague or incorrect prose; few
ideas. |
| At any point on the course, you can check your progress
toward the grade you want to earn by totaling the points youve earned and dividing
that by the total number of points possible. Match that percentage against a ten-point
scale. If you ever have a question about your standing in the course or the grade on an
assignment, come by my office, call or e-mail me, and lets discuss it. |
|
Requirements |
pts possible / earned |
| Weekly Response |
30 _______ |
| Papers |
50 _______ |
| Reflections |
10 _______ |
| 3 Ps |
10 _______ |
| Total |
100 _______ |
|