[Home]
 |
English 102:
Reading, Writing, and Research: The Sense of Place |
Table of Contents
[Policies] [Requirements and Papers] [Grading]
[Schedule] [Resources]
Course Overview
English 102 is a course on reading, writing, and research. To
practice and become more skillful in these arts, our course will focus on American places:
their history, literature, people,
institutions, and land. We will explore a place as more than a name on a map, or the
accumulation of events that have happened there, but will hope to capture the sense of a
place--the meanings, perception and emotion of individuals responding to their
surroundings and to events. In our readings, we may follow the ways that Americans have
adapted to places, but also the ways they have shaped them through patterns of settlement
and culture.
In addition to weekly logs on readings and annotations from your research, you will
write one formal research paper on a place of your choice. You may choose to write about
your place, and your connection (or rejection) of it, or select some other place
of
regional or national importance to focus your term project on.

Presence, Preparation, and Participation
-- English courses are not lecture courses; they are
reading and writing courses that require your consistent and active engagement. As such,
they often have a de facto attendance policy, as this one does. You can't earn high marks in
this process if you aren't present, prepared, and participating. Your instructor and your
classmates expect you to attend regularly and prepare thoughtfully for each class session.
Complete the assignments prior to our meeting and come to class ready to work, share, and
listen. Writers seldom work completely in isolation all the time; therefore, it is
important, at different stages of the writing and revising process, to share information,
discuss strategies, and receive feedback. Throughout the semester, you will most likely
work closely with your classmates reading and responding to each other's work. Everyone
will benefit if we are all prepared to engage in this type of work. Miss more than two
weeks of class (7 days MWF, 5 days T,TH,) and you will receive an F for the course).
Persons missing one class or none will receive extra credit.
Academic Honesty and Plagiarism The University Affairs Council has asked
all faculty to include the following statement in our course policies:
"By accepting admission to Radford University, each student makes a commitment to
understand, support, and abide by the University Honor Code without compromise or
exception. Violations of academic integrity will not be tolerated. This class will be
conducted in strict observance of the Honor Code. Please refer to your Student Handbook
for details."
Plagiarism, or the use of work by another
person, or the use of someone else's words, ideas or arrangement of ideas without giving
proper reference to the author, is a serious violation of the Honor Code. You must give
credit to other people's ideas and word, even if you put the idea in your own words (even
if you paraphrase it). You must also provide full and correct documentation of the exact
location of any sources that helped you, including Web or electronic resources. Plagiarism
will result in an "F" for the course and the institution of formal disciplinary
procedures.
Late Work Since the processes of reading, writing,
and research involve several stages and require incubation time for ideas to develop, you
must submit work on time for it to reach its full potential in this course. Papers must
come in on time; for logs or annotations, some exceptions can be made. You will not
receive credit for work that comes in late, unless you contact me before
the date the assignment is due. At that time, we will discuss your situation and the
possibility of an extension. If you are unable to attend class, you may send your work to
class with someone else so that you can receive credit for the work and feedback from your
peers.
Writing Group Throughout the semester, class meetings
will be devoted to reviewing and critiquing rough drafts of assignments, including logs. A
paper that does not receive an in-class peer review will be penalized when submitted as a
final draft. On a day before the scheduled peer reviews, you are required to bring enough
copies of your paper for your group and one for your instructor (so we may read your paper
ahead of time). Your participation in these groups is vital to your growth as a writer and
the success of the course, so read your peers drafts thoroughly and provide the
kinds of feedback you yourself would like to receive. The draft you produce for these
groups should be written as if it were a final version. We will often begin the
class by exchanging reading logs and questions.

 | Required texts:
|
--we will have several readings from a coursepack
--you will also need email from RU and some money for photocopying
 | Reading Logs -- For each selection that we read, you will write a
response of about 150 - 200 words (the above course overview is 165). The heading for each
log should use the correct MLA documentation form for an essay in an anthology when cited
on a Works Cited page. Thus, your heading should look like a works cited page containing
the bibliographic information for the essay or essays assigned for that log. On days that
we have two readings, arrange the entries alphabetically according to the authors' last
names, as on a works cited page. See Diana Hacker's A Writer's Reference for
correct MLA form. Put your name and log number at the top. Logs will be collected and
recorded on the day of the assigned reading. You will have occasion to revise several
based on the feedback from your writing group. (Your 20 best entries x 2pts
each = 40) |
Purpose: Writing a log on the readings should help to enrich your
understanding and strengthen your powers of verbal expression. The best aspect of writing
a response is that it supports your personal and intellectual growth. (It also verifies
that you've done the reading, thought about it, and don't need quizzes to test that
knowledge.) Your log is your initial contribution to class discussion. In discussion, you
are expected to go beyond those points, listen to others, and develop fresh ideas. The log
is not a substitute for talking and listening well.
Content of Entries:
Content of Entries: You should work toward three things in the log:
summarize what the essay says, analyze how it says it (use of evidence, style), and
reflect on what is significant to you about what it says. You should show your knowledge
of the reading, both in large concepts and specific details, and provide a point of view
or question about the reading that contributes to class discussion. You are working to
turn a mix of facts, ideas, and opinions into a crisp, coherent statement. Responses are a
series of snapshots about what you are thinking and learning. Your question (or point of
view) should help you examine what you believe to be the most important ideas of the
piece. Try to ask questions that get at its purpose and its significance, assumptions and
biases, evidence and argument. Avoid simplistic questions that can be answered with a
"yes" or a "no" or with a simple objective fact. If you wish, some of
your questions may draw parallels or contrasts among the other readings for the course. If
there are two readings, you should write two logs, and two questions, but you should put
them on the same piece of paper.
Your entries need not be a polished final product. The prose should be informal but clear
and correct (please spellcheck and proofread) and could be considered the level of
discourse you might expect in a good letter or memo from a colleague at work. It should be
writing however and not "chat" (as in a chat room), because this kind of
writing/speech can be slangy, disconnected, and simplistic in vocabulary.
Vocabulary and definitions: For each assigned reading, you
will keep a list of unfamiliar vocabulary words as you read. When you type your log, you
will provide a dictionary definition for each new word. If you wish, use
an online dictionary and cut and paste.
Criteria for assessment: Each
log will be graded according to how successfully it: 1) exhibits a clear point of view
about the reading and asks a substantive question that opens up discussion of key issues
raised by the text; 2) uses correct MLA form; 3) demonstrates clear and correct
writing; 4) notes new vocabulary words and defines them. Each log will receive a
grade of 2 (strong), 1 (acceptable), or no credit.
 | Annotations ¯ The annotations
will be written the same way as the logs, about the same length, with an MLA reference and
internal notation, only they will be from sources you find and that are appropriate for
your paper. You should produce one annotation per week, before spring break and
beginning week three (hand them in anytime that week), and two per week after
spring break, not including peer review weeks (15 total). After reading your sources (and
a'noting in them) them, prepare a critical and explanatory response, as with the
log: what does it say? how does it say it? why
is it important (especially to you and your project)? The annotations on your
sources should try to follow the the topics and themes of that week (follow the week
number link on the schedule for more information). For example, for week three,
"past," annotate a source that discusses the history of your chosen place. You
must mix internet, periodical, book, and primary sources (one week's annotations could be
your interview notes), and should learn to use a variety of (re)search tools and
"engines." Unlike logs, annotations do not need questions, but you could be
asked to discuss what your are finding in your research in class. Annotations will be
graded in the same manner as the logs. (15 total x2 pts each for a total of 30 pts) |
 | Beginning and ending reflections ¯ Two short papers, of about two pages: one during the first week of class on your
relationship to a place and your reading of The Rediscovery of North America, the
other either to be written for or during the exam time. |
 | The Final Project ¯ Research, through primary and secondary
sources, a history of your hometown, neighborhood, or some other place of regional or
national importance. In your research, and in your writing, look for opportunities to
explain the cause and effect relationships of events (not just this happened then this
happened). How has your town developed in the way that it has? If you have lived in
a neighborhood for a long enough period of time to notice that it has undergone changes in
terms of development or demographics, your paper could explain these changes. In
what specific ways has it changed? What factors have contributed to these
changes? Where will these changes lead? Consider illustrating your history with maps
or photographs of landscape, architecture, or people, including those you interview. You
will get a final grade on the final paper only, though you will get feedback in the early
stages, and part of your grade will consider not only the finished product, but the
process and quality of the earlier drafts. |
Deadline |
Stage |
Length and content |
25 Feb |
Proposal |
3-5 pages, topic, argument, and
main sources |
5 April |
Rough Draft |
7-8 pages, argument, evidence, headings and
organization, analysis of sources |
28 April |
Final Version |
12 pages, final version of project and presentation
Though you're not likely to write about Paramus, New Jersey, see the sample. |
[return to top] |

(Note: Grading is not a mathematical science; we consider
effort, and sincere, constructive class participation may raise your grade.) |
Component: % |
A Level Grades |
B Level Grades |
C Level Grades |
D-F Grades |
Presence,
Preparation Participation: 5 |
Hardly ever miss a class; active
talking & listening, alert and thoughtful |
miss 3 classes classes, prepared
but mostly listen |
miss 4 -5, sometimes late, silent
& inattentive |
miss 6 or more; Sometimes
rude |
Reading Log: 20 |
high quality questions, response
and writing; good summary, citation and paraphrase |
good quality, some evidence,
general questions |
fair quality analysis and
response; poor documentation |
fair quality analysis and
response; poor documentation |
Annotations: 15 |
solid research and analysis;
variety of sources that are applicable to topic |
good research and writing but
difficult to ascertain how it applies to the project focus |
little effort into hunting down
sources; decent writing and MLA form |
little effort into hunting down
sources; poor documentation |
Beginning and
ending reflections: 10 |
say something, fulfill the
assignment in a fresh and mature way |
say something, but a little more
predictable and without the specificity of A papers |
say very little: are general and
vague, do not develop ideas, provide few specifics, lacks unity and focus |
show the inability to handle the
previous criteria. |
Papers: 50 |
original views, strong evidence
& argument, clear precise prose |
familiar views, weak evidence
& argument, vague prose |
few ideas, chaotic form, no
argument, often incorrect prose |
vague or incorrect prose; few
ideas. |
Requirements |
pts possible / earned |
3 Ps |
10 _______ |
Reading log |
40 _______ |
Annotations |
30 _______ |
Reflections |
20 _______ |
Papers |
100 _______ |
At any point on the course, you can check your progress
toward the grade you want to earn by totaling the points youve earned and dividing
that by the total number of points possible. Match that percentage against a ten-point
scale. If you ever have a question about your standing in the course or the grade on an
assignment, come by my office, call or e-mail me, and lets discuss it. |
[return to top] |