[Home]

English 102:   Reading, Writing, and Research:   The Sense of Place

instructors time and place

email alias

Rick Van Noy   MWF 9 - 9:50, Curie 37 ru-engl102-10-spring
Kelley Trear   MWF 8 - 8:50, Young 303 ru-engl102-01-spring
Michael Blankenship   MWF 1 - 1:50, Whit 9 ru-engl102-41-spring

Table of Contents

[Policies] [Requirements and Papers] [Grading] [Schedule] [Resources]

Course Overview

English 102 is a course on reading, writing, and research. To practice and become more skillful in these arts, our course will focus on American places: their history, literature, people, institutions, and land.  We will explore a place as more than a name on a map, or the accumulation of events that have happened there, but will hope to capture the sense of a place--the meanings, perception and emotion of individuals responding to their surroundings and to events. In our readings, we may follow the ways that Americans have adapted to places, but also the ways they have shaped them through patterns of settlement and culture.

In addition to weekly logs on readings and annotations from your research, you will write one formal research paper on a place of your choice. You may choose to write about your place, and your connection (or rejection) of it, or select some other place of regional or national importance to focus your term project on.

Policies

Presence, Preparation, and Participation -- English courses are not lecture courses; they are reading and writing courses that require your consistent and active engagement. As such, they often have a de facto attendance policy, as this one does. You can't earn high marks in this process if you aren't present, prepared, and participating. Your instructor and your classmates expect you to attend regularly and prepare thoughtfully for each class session. Complete the assignments prior to our meeting and come to class ready to work, share, and listen. Writers seldom work completely in isolation all the time; therefore, it is important, at different stages of the writing and revising process, to share information, discuss strategies, and receive feedback. Throughout the semester, you will most likely work closely with your classmates reading and responding to each other's work. Everyone will benefit if we are all prepared to engage in this type of work. Miss more than two weeks of class (7 days MWF, 5 days T,TH,) and you will receive an F for the course). Persons missing one class or none will receive extra credit.

Academic Honesty and Plagiarism
— The University Affairs Council has asked all faculty to include the following statement in our course policies: 

"By accepting admission to Radford University, each student makes a commitment to understand, support, and abide by the University Honor Code without compromise or exception. Violations of academic integrity will not be tolerated. This class will be conducted in strict observance of the Honor Code. Please refer to your Student Handbook for details."

Plagiarism, or the use of work by another person, or the use of someone else's words, ideas or arrangement of ideas without giving proper reference to the author, is a serious violation of the Honor Code. You must give credit to other people's ideas and word, even if you put the idea in your own words (even if you paraphrase it). You must also provide full and correct documentation of the exact location of any sources that helped you, including Web or electronic resources. Plagiarism will result in an "F" for the course and the institution of formal disciplinary procedures.

Late Work — Since the processes of reading, writing, and research involve several stages and require incubation time for ideas to develop, you must submit work on time for it to reach its full potential in this course. Papers must come in on time; for logs or annotations, some exceptions can be made. You will not receive credit for work that comes in late, unless you contact me before the date the assignment is due.  At that time, we will discuss your situation and the possibility of an extension. If you are unable to attend class, you may send your work to class with someone else so that you can receive credit for the work and feedback from your peers.

Writing Group — Throughout the semester, class meetings will be devoted to reviewing and critiquing rough drafts of assignments, including logs. A paper that does not receive an in-class peer review will be penalized when submitted as a final draft. On a day before the scheduled peer reviews, you are required to bring enough copies of your paper for your group and one for your instructor (so we may read your paper ahead of time). Your participation in these groups is vital to your growth as a writer and the success of the course, so read your peers’ drafts thoroughly and provide the kinds of feedback you yourself would like to receive. The draft you produce for these groups should be written as if it were a final version. We will often begin the class by exchanging reading logs and questions. 

Course Requirements

bulletRequired texts:
Bookcover Bookcover Bookcover Bookcover

--we will have several readings from a coursepack
--you will also need email from RU and some money for photocopying

bulletReading Logs -- For each selection that we read, you will write a response of about 150 - 200 words (the above course overview is 165). The heading for each log should use the correct MLA documentation form for an essay in an anthology when cited on a Works Cited page. Thus, your heading should look like a works cited page containing the bibliographic information for the essay or essays assigned for that log. On days that we have two readings, arrange the entries alphabetically according to the authors' last names, as on a works cited page. See Diana Hacker's A Writer's Reference for correct MLA form. Put your name and log number at the top. Logs will be collected and recorded on the day of the assigned reading. You will have occasion to revise several based on the feedback from your writing group.  (Your 20 best entries x 2pts each = 40)

Purpose: Writing a log on the readings should help to enrich your understanding and strengthen your powers of verbal expression. The best aspect of writing a response is that it supports your personal and intellectual growth. (It also verifies that you've done the reading, thought about it, and don't need quizzes to test that knowledge.) Your log is your initial contribution to class discussion. In discussion, you are expected to go beyond those points, listen to others, and develop fresh ideas. The log is not a substitute for talking and listening well.

Content of Entries:

Content of Entries: You should work toward three things in the log: summarize what the essay says, analyze how it says it (use of evidence, style), and reflect on what is significant to you about what it says. You should show your knowledge of the reading, both in large concepts and specific details, and provide a point of view or question about the reading that contributes to class discussion. You are working to turn a mix of facts, ideas, and opinions into a crisp, coherent statement. Responses are a series of snapshots about what you are thinking and learning. Your question (or point of view) should help you examine what you believe to be the most important ideas of the piece. Try to ask questions that get at its purpose and its significance, assumptions and biases, evidence and argument. Avoid simplistic questions that can be answered with a "yes" or a "no" or with a simple objective fact. If you wish, some of your questions may draw parallels or contrasts among the other readings for the course. If there are two readings, you should write two logs, and two questions, but you should put them on the same piece of paper.  

Your entries need not be a polished final product. The prose should be informal but clear and correct (please spellcheck and proofread) and could be considered the level of discourse you might expect in a good letter or memo from a colleague at work. It should be writing however and not "chat" (as in a chat room), because this kind of writing/speech can be slangy, disconnected, and simplistic in vocabulary.

Vocabulary and definitions: For each assigned reading, you will keep a list of unfamiliar vocabulary words as you read. When you type your log, you will provide a dictionary definition for each new word. If you wish, use an online dictionary and cut and paste.

Criteria for assessment: Each log will be graded according to how successfully it: 1) exhibits a clear point of view about the reading and asks a substantive question that opens up discussion of key issues raised by the text; 2) uses correct MLA form; 3) demonstrates clear and correct writing;  4) notes new vocabulary words and defines them. Each log will receive a grade of 2 (strong), 1 (acceptable), or no credit.

bulletAnnotations ¯ The annotations will be written the same way as the logs, about the same length, with an MLA reference and internal notation, only they will be from sources you find and that are appropriate for your paper. You should produce one annotation per week, before spring break and beginning week three (hand them in anytime that week), and two per week after spring break, not including peer review weeks (15 total). After reading your sources (and a'noting in them) them, prepare a critical and explanatory response, as with the log:  what does it say? how does it say it? why is it important (especially to you and your project)? The annotations on your sources should try to follow the the topics and themes of that week (follow the week number link on the schedule for more information). For example, for week three, "past," annotate a source that discusses the history of your chosen place. You must mix internet, periodical, book, and primary sources (one week's annotations could be your interview notes), and should learn to use a variety of (re)search tools and "engines." Unlike logs, annotations do not need questions, but you could be asked to discuss what your are finding in your research in class. Annotations will be graded in the same manner as the logs. (15 total x2 pts each for a total of 30 pts)

bulletBeginning and ending reflections ¯ Two short papers, of about two pages: one during the first week of class on your relationship to a place and your reading of The Rediscovery of North America, the other either to be written for or during the exam time.

bulletThe Final Project ¯ Research, through primary and secondary sources, a history of your hometown, neighborhood, or some other place of regional or national importance. In your research, and in your writing, look for opportunities to explain the cause and effect relationships of events (not just this happened then this happened).  How has your town developed in the way that it has? If you have lived in a neighborhood for a long enough period of time to notice that it has undergone changes in terms of development or demographics, your paper could explain these changes.  In what specific ways has it changed?  What factors have contributed to these changes?  Where will these changes lead? Consider illustrating your history with maps or photographs of landscape, architecture, or people, including those you interview. You will get a final grade on the final paper only, though you will get feedback in the early stages, and part of your grade will consider not only the finished product, but the process and quality of the earlier drafts. 

Deadline Stage Length and content
 25 Feb Proposal  3-5 pages, topic, argument, and main sources
 5 April Rough Draft  7-8 pages, argument, evidence, headings and organization, analysis of sources
 28 April Final Version  12 pages, final version of project and presentation
Though you're not likely to write about Paramus, New Jersey, see the sample.

[return to top]

Grading

(Note: Grading is not a mathematical science; we consider effort, and sincere, constructive class participation may raise your grade.)

Component: %

A Level Grades B Level Grades C Level Grades D-F Grades

Presence, Preparation Participation: 5

Hardly ever miss a class; active talking & listening, alert and thoughtful miss 3 classes classes, prepared but mostly listen miss 4 -5, sometimes late, silent & inattentive miss 6 or more;  Sometimes rude

Reading Log: 20

high quality questions, response and writing; good summary, citation and paraphrase good quality, some evidence, general questions fair quality analysis and response; poor documentation fair quality analysis and response; poor documentation

Annotations: 15

solid research and analysis; variety of sources that are applicable to topic good research and writing but difficult to ascertain how it applies to the project focus little effort into hunting down   sources; decent writing and MLA form little effort into hunting down sources;  poor documentation

Beginning and ending reflections: 10

say something, fulfill the assignment in a fresh and mature way say something, but a little more predictable and without the specificity of A papers say very little: are general and vague, do not develop ideas, provide few specifics, lacks unity and focus show the inability to handle the previous criteria.

Papers: 50

original views, strong evidence & argument, clear precise prose familiar views, weak evidence & argument, vague prose few ideas, chaotic form, no argument, often incorrect prose vague or incorrect prose; few ideas.
Requirements pts possible / earned
3 Ps 10   _______
Reading log 40   _______
Annotations 30   _______
Reflections 20   _______
Papers 100  _______
At any point on the course, you can check your progress toward the grade you want to earn by totaling the points you’ve earned and dividing that by the total number of points possible. Match that percentage against a ten-point scale. If you ever have a question about your standing in the course or the grade on an assignment, come by my office, call or e-mail me, and let’s discuss it.

[return to top]

url: http://rvannoy.asp.radford.edu
last updated: 02/07/2008
maintained by: Rick Van Noy
contact:
rvannoy@radford.edu